Talk:Least squares

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Least squares article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 3 months

Statistics Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Mathematics High‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-priority on the project's priority scale.

Justifying derivation of general solution for linear least squares

I think the notation $Y$ here is a little confusing, because $Y$ makes it seem like it could be a matrix, when in fact it has to be a vector:

L(D,{\vec {\beta }})=||X{\vec {\beta }}-Y||^{2}=(X{\vec {\beta }}-Y)^{T}(X{\vec {\beta }}-Y)=Y^{T}Y-Y^{T}X{\vec {\beta }}-{\vec {\beta }}^{T}X^{T}Y+{\vec {\beta }}^{T}X^{T}X{\vec {\beta }}

I'd consider replacing $Y$ with ${\vec {y}}$ . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fadmmatt (talk • contribs) 17:53, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Least squares. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091110212529/http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~tibs/ElemStatLearn/ to http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~tibs/ElemStatLearn/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:01, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

complex application

Would it be worthwhile to mention how the formula needs modification for complex values? We don't want the squared error to be negative. (When I used it, I had to work this out from first principles.) One could simply make the formula more general by adding conjugation bars where appropriate, and explain that this is redundant when all values are real. —Tamfang (talk) 05:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]